

Commentary, Reviews and Articles on: Wargaming, Economics, and Society. www.bluetablepainting.com


Posted by Blue Table Painting at 8:30 PM 0 comments
I was watching the Daily Show tonight and the book featured sounds like the exact opposite of what I've been reading. So I'm going to get it and read it!
Justin Fox: The Myth of the Rational Market
The thesis as far as I can tell, is that when left to themselves people would make a worse situation than is had with government interference.
Perfect, a book with a counter-argument. I'll let you all know how it goes.
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 7:43 PM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 10:14 AM 0 comments
If you haven't seen this movie, you're a dope. Here's a clip.
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 7:43 PM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 5:42 PM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 12:18 PM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 7:36 AM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 7:04 AM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 9:41 PM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 9:44 PM 0 comments

Posted by Blue Table Painting at 9:50 AM 0 comments

Well, the call of Tzeentch has been heard. The pic is of a figure by a company from Spain. The game's name is Hell Dorado. The figures are pretty disturbing. They're sort of hard to get. I happened across a few, so I have an unpainted version of this vulture creature thing. I'm going to use it as a Changeling.
I was up at 7am this morning, answering emails. I am standing by to set up projects. We've been clearing things out at record pace. I have in my heart that I want to keep BTP's excellent crew busy. Will you do us the honor of putting us to work? It is a high compliment that someone would trade part of their life (time to produce something that is sold for money) for part of our life.
Once at the studio I realized I was pretty much caught up. So, when the good wife called and said she was going out to run some errands, I jumped on the bandwagon. All six of us in the van, then lunch at Sam's Club (hot dogs, ice cream, pizza and soda). Then when we got home, Tamie had to run an errand (some school meeting) and asked if I could stay home with the kids. I find it nearly impossible to say no to her. I just love her so much and want to be useful for her.
But it didn't stop there. I went to sleep on the couch to an episode of Star Trek (now in season five). So, I managed to get back to the studio around 4pm. I stayed late and wrapped up almost every loose end. There are still some projects waiting to have pics taken.
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 10:44 PM 0 comments
Got this little treat from an observant reader:
I could be wrong, but the issue of inflation seems like small potatoes compared to other questionable ways that banks make money. About a week ago, Matt Taibbi published a pretty amazing piece in Rolling Stone about Goldman Sachs that has drawn the ire of the company.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/28816321/the_great_american_bubble_machine
What do you think?
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 7:46 PM 0 comments
How the Federal Reserve Causes Inflation
Here are some quotes from the book "Meltdown" by Thomas Woods (2009) followed by my own comments. I think it is important for humans to understand the world in which they live. I live in a world where I will spend ten to twenty years of my life working indirectly for bankers. I will sweat, they will eat the bread.
I am not upset about this. There is an abundant and gracious God in Heaven who has opened my heart to the beauty of the world. I will only be here a short while. He will make all things right in the end. Nevertheless, it is the song of every soul to improve the world, and to bring truth to light.
And so here I go.
The Federal Reserve controls the American money supply and can influence interest rates either upward or downward; it can also function as a “lender of last resort.” Although people use the phrase “printing money” as a kind of shorthand for what the Fed does, the Fed increases the money supply not by printing cash and putting it into circulation, but by what are called “open-market operations,” which involve the purchase and sale of assets. Strictly speaking, the Fed can purchase any kind of asset it wants, but it normally purchases government bonds. If it wants to increase the money supply, it purchases, say, $1 billion in bonds from a bond dealer. It makes the purchase by writing a check on itself for $1 billion and handing it to a firm like Goldman Sachs in exchange for the bonds. It creates this $1 billion out of thin air.
Goldman Sachs then deposits this $1 billion check from the Fed in its bank. That bank doesn’t put the e$1 billion in a special vault with “Goldman’s Money” on the door. Instead, the bank will lend out most of that $1 billion, since the law only requires it to keep a small percentage of its deposits on reserve. (Most of the banks’ reserves, incidentally, are kept in its own account at the Fed, with a small amount in cash in its vaults to satisfy normal day-to-day requests for cash by the bank’s depositors.) When the bank, in turn, lends out the money, borrowers spend it, and it winds up in accounts in other banks, which use most of that money in still another round of expansion, and so on. With a reserve requirement of ten percent, the initial $1 billion will have supported $9 billion in additional lending by the time this process is complete. All of this $10 billion has been created out of nothing: the initial $1 billion check from the Fed, and the additional $9 billion in loans that the fractional-reserve banking makes possible, were produced out of thin air. Should the Fed wish to contract credit, it follows this procedure in reverse: it sells the bonds to the banks, and the money it receives for them—and the further increase in the money supply that the fractional-reserve system then created on top of it—are withdrawn from the economy.
…
Although people often define inflation as a general rise in prices, and economists themselves employ that definition as a kind of shorthand, inflation is actually the increase of the money supply itself (which in turn leads to higher prices than would otherwise have prevailed). Specifically, it is an increase in the amount of money in circulation not backed by the monetary commodity—in other words, an increase in paper-note claims tot gold not backed by increases in gold itself. Under a fiat standard, which the countries of the world have now, in which the monetary system is not backed by a commodity, we can define inflation simply as an increase in the amount of paper money in circulation.
…
Consider this question: in what order and in what way does the new money make its way through he economy? When eh government inflates the money supply, the new money does not reach everyone simultaneously and proportionately. It enters the economy at discrete points. The earliest recipients of the new money include politically favored constituencies…: banks, for example, or firms with government contracts. These privileged parties receive the new money before inflation has pushed prices upwards… the privileged firms that are lucky enough to get the new money benefit from being able to make their purchases at the previously existing price level—thereby silently looting those from whom they buy. When the average person gets his hands on this new money… prices have already been rising for quite a while… The value of his money was diluted by the new money before it ever reached him.
…
Now imagine a situation in which business firms or banks connected to the government receive a new influx of money courtesy of Fed credit expansion. That money comes out of thin air, not from the sale of some previous good or service. Thus when these favored firms spend this money, they are in effect taking goods out of the economy without providing anything themselves. Here we see very clearly how they benefit at the expense of the rest of society: they take from the stock of goods without giving anything in return. The money they pay for their goods didn’t originate in a good or service that they themselves had previously provided; it came from nowhere. The analogous case under a system of barter would be one in which, instead of trading my bread for your orange juice, I just [drink] your orange juice.
-- Thomas Woods, Meltdown (2009)
Shawn's Comments
I have read this book twice now, underlining and taking notes. The first third of the book is an overview of recent history; the bailouts (even a few notes about those in the last few decades), deregulation, regulation and nationalizing banks. Then the meaty parts: the core mechanics of how things work; what is money? what is inflation? The book ends with a chapter entitled "What Now?" which gives suggestions about how sound principles can restore some sense of reason
All of this has been of profound effect on me. I wasn't expecting this book to help me in the micro-economic function of my business, but it indeed helped me to understand my universe better and to act on it. I have cut the banks out of the loop. I have started integrating the ideas of commodities, barter and real money into my life. I have started living more within my means.
I don't like conspiracy theory. Even if it were true, what could I do about it? That's why on this blog I try to take a more "common-man-bolts-and-nuts" approach.
One profound impression I had is that the common man is indeed capable of understanding these things. Indeed, I think that each citizen would do well to put down the game-controller for a month and gulp down a few books on economics.
It doesn't take a genius to know that if every dollar were suddenly twinned, then prices would go up.. how much?
Why are homes and college educations so expensive? These are sectors where credit expansion is the most rampant, and where government has distorted economic reality the most.
If a house were to cost $50,000 could you buy one outright? Could you save up over time?
Right now, home prices are seeking their real, true value.
It's starting to make sense.
As usual, I invite differing viewpoints. Is this book wrong? Are there factual errors? Am I not seeing the whole picture? I am just an average guy trying to put it together.
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 10:19 AM 0 comments
I was reading this article on Ron Paul's bill to audit the Federal Reserve:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31784137/ns/business-us_business/
Note the words used:
It's an "attack" on the Federal Reserve (he's not questioning or advancing).
Ron Paul has a "gang" (not a coalition or alliance)
It's Ron Paul's "little" bill (what's little about it?)
He has a "vendetta" against the Federal Reserve. He's a "radical" (not a forward-thinker or a leader).
His "gang of 244" (since when is 244 people out of 435 a "gang"?)
Congress is "upset" and "doesn't like" the Fed.
The Fed is only going to "intervene responsibly" when "necessary". Oh thank goodness! The good and wise Federal Reserve is always there to lend a helping hand!
Remember, the Federal Reserve is a private entity. It controls the one thing that you can't trust anyone with: the money supply. In fact, the very definitioin of money has been warped in the last 100 years (since 1913 when the Federal Reserve was established).
This bill (HR 1207) is only so we can take a limited look inside. It amazes me that this is considered to be extraordinary. The commoners want a tour of the castle, the mysterious castle from which the decrees are issued. We wait with baited breath while our betters make the decisions.
These people are not smarter than you.
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 7:53 AM 0 comments
"They were in the Broadway production of Corsairs."
- S. Purser
New tag line for War Machine: "That does what now?"
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 4:09 PM 0 comments

Here are the trade-in rates for July 2009. I'm offering service credit in trade for models. Read this completely as I have recently improved several aspects of this program. Notably: I am now trading in army books. Also, you do not need to figure out the retail prices of your trade-in items.
.
You can usually get a much better deal going to the secondary market (local shop, ebay) on your own. However, the advantage of trading in with us is that you are likely to be able to unload disparate items without a lot of hassle (e.g. finding various buyers, setting up payment, lots of minor questions).
.
If you want to trade in, we need a list of what you have. You do NOT need to calculate the retail value, but it helps. Please tell me the condition (e.g. new in box, new on sprue, assembled, primed). The rates below are a multiplier. If the entry says 0.30 it means you would get $30 for $100 worth of retail items. Just take the retail total and multiply it by the number. You do not need to figure this out; you can just send in your list of stuff to bluetablepainting@gmail.com
.
In the past I have only allowed for half or less of a project to be paid in credit this way. But for the time being I am lifting that restriction.
.
I just know there's someone who goes out to their garage, surveys the mass of unpainted models, sighs then turns out the light. This program will hopefully allow someone with the "white primer horde" to finally show up with a painted army. As an added bonus, your models will get a good home where they will be painted and loved.
.
We don’t need painted figures. Exception: if they only have a little bit done with them; not too thick, not too many layers. Primed models are OK, again not too thick.
.
You can also get a credit of at least $10 to help with your shipping costs. This is on request. .
If you want to trade-in figures, but don't have a project ready, that's OK, I will confirm your total and then you will have it on tap for when you want to use it.
.
This trade-in is recorded as a payment on your project. It is non-refundable except at our discretion (eg you can’t refuse the project and then get your trade-in amount refunded as cash). Trade-in can be applied to cost of models, assembly or painting as you wish. This means you can also just get models sent to you (this is limited to models that are commonly available, eg not Forge World).
.
Generally, we only need in-print models that are currently in production.
.
These rates and conditions may change so it is recommended to check in every once in a while. I am likely to update the numbers about once a month. The plan right now is to update every first of the month. Fairness is the guiding principle.
.
Forge World 0.49
.
Army books $8 credit (must be current edition, no OOP)
.
Assault on Black Reach Models:
Complete set of orks $9 credit
Complete set of space marines $9 credit
Space Marine Dreadnought $5 credit
Small rulebook $5 credit
Template sprue (complete) $3 credit
. Chaos Space Marines 0.24
. Daemonhunters 0.20
. Daemons of Chaos 0.30
. Eldar 0.20
. Imperial Guard 0.34
. Necrons 0.20
. Orks 0.25
. Space Marines 0.25
. Tau 0.25
. Tyranids 0.26
. Witch Hunters 0.24
. Warhammer Fantasy 0.30
. Hordes 0.32
. War Machine 0.20 (Cryx 0.30)
. Battlefleet Gothic 0.11
. Lord of the Rings 0.17
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 1:05 PM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 7:02 AM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 10:49 PM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 9:16 AM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 10:13 PM 0 comments

See more pics of these conversions here
Currently booking projects for late July and August. Ready to go whenever you are.
First: I got a lot of comments from readers recently. I have summarized them all into one post.
http://bluetablepainting.blogspot.com/2009/07/various-comments-on-economicsposts.html
I would like to point out that you are getting something here that you are unlikely to find many other places: reasoned, measured and open social discussion.
I welcome, absolutely welcome any well-thought-out response. I am an explorer. I want to hear new ideas.
It was overcast today, and in the evening it was raining slightly. A cool summer day. It's been rainy this month.
For me, it is a time of peace. Things are running smoothly. Plenty of food in the house.
We are working on a significant Cities of Death project. I took some video of that today. With the completion of the Skorne, I am doing no projects. Hey waitaminit, I've got that Stompa all ready to go. I will get cracking on that over the weekend. That will mightily complete the Orks.
We have no plans for Fourth of July, thank goodness. Just barbecue.
I'm about halfway through Season 4 of ST:TNG.
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 8:14 PM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 12:26 PM 0 comments
I've received quite a few thoughtful comments. Here they are in one handy post!
Shawn,
.
Enjoyed the post and the advice from the blog you referenced [Blog post = Back to Basics]... The advice he/she is giving though is the same advice that has been given out since... forever. The end of modern civilization has always been right around the corner. Perhaps I'm more of an optimist. I think it is smart to invest in real things right now as well, but as with any sort of investing the best way to do it is to diversify your investments. The man who put all his money into his bomb shelter preparing for the war with the USSR feels pretty stupid right about now. I don't see the harm in preparing for the worst, that is what the Church's canned food program is all about... What the Relief Society [Mormon women's organization] was all about too, for that matter helping other's in need while providing DIY skills to members.
.
There are still good businesses out there. Businesses that make things that people use to do and make thing. Investing in those types of businesses is not a bad idea. I think the key word here is to invest, and not speculate which is what it seems the majority of people have been doing. I laud the end of the consumer age... Now, hopefully the USA can get back to making things of real value and exporting them to the rest of the world! I don't know if this is going to happen now, but it seems more and more people have decided they want a more fulfilling life than the one offered by a cubicle trading 0s and 1s across telephone wires. That they see the world of their grandparents or parents was a better one than the one we have now, the difference? America made things.
.
I like a lot of what Ron Paul says, though I fear that the world he wants would soon be controlled by an oligarchy... I don't believe that the market is a panacea to our problems. For more on the libertarian front I recommend Free Talk Live (http://freetalklive.com/), funny enough it was listening to them an reading more about the libertarian movement that convinced me that an absolutely free market would not solve our problems, which I'm sure is contrary to the hosts' intent. Also in the vein of reading baout the absolute worst possible outcome I can recommend http://www.kunstler.com/blog/, Mr. Kunstler is convinced that our grandchildren will be living in a world more closely resembling the one our grandparents grew up in, as opposed to the one we did.
.
Sincerely,
JH
------------------------------------------------
Hi Shawn,
.
I played WHFB about a decade ago and stumbled on to your youtube channel by way of some idle curiosity about what had become of the game. I have watched a bunch of your videos mostly because you and your staff are pretty entertaining. From there I also have come to check in on your blog fairly regularly and couldn't resist your invitation to talk some political economy.
I really like when people try to discuss politics openly and rationaly because I think one of the biggest problems in America is an uninformed and disinterested public. That said, just to be upfront, I think we have world views that have some overlap, but for the most part are very different as I am generally fairly far left leaning.
.
I wanted to offer a counterpoint to your assessment of the banking industry as parasitic and worthless.
.
The finance industry has plenty of big problems which are worth discussing, and I think it is valuable to consider very fundamental changes to the industry. However, reading your perspective, you seem to doubt that banks do anything valuable. I would argue that a basic loan is a very useful service that contributes a great deal to our society. Loans allow people to afford tools (houses, store fronts, cars, factory machines) that are otherwise out of their immediate financial means, but once obtained, these tools increase the people's finanicial means to a level where the tools are more than affordable. These tools can allow them to succeed in ways that are otherwise impossible.
.
Allow me a personal example. My only large loans have been in the form of student loans (provided by a bank). My education was something that I could not afford when I finished high school, but once obtained, my education has allowed to be substantially more productive. I now have a good job, and I have not missed a payment on my loans, nor do I plan to. My mother worked as a teacher and a school adminitrator all her life and wouldn't not have been able to afford to send me to college on her own without the loans. While I could have worked crummy jobs trying to save up for school, it is much more efficient for me to have gone to school first, be paying a bit more because of interest, and now be doing much more valuable work. In some way this is thanks to the loans I took.
.
In parting, I don't think I am economically ignorant, but I am definitely a lay person. For me, I found the following NPR broadcast (now podcast) to explain the financial crisis in a way that was easy to understand and really concrete and comes from many points of view. Maybe you can give it a listen while you paint some minis and let me know what you think. It's about an hour long.
.
http://www.thislife.org/radio_episode.aspx?episode=355
You can get free audio or a transcript from the link.
.
Regards,
Michael
Shawn's Response: When you drive a new car off the lot, the value goes down significantly, sometimes to half. The common logic is that somehow the real value of the car is not represented properly in the world outside the dealership. You owe $20,000 for something that now only has a sale-able value of $15,000. The reading I've done suggests that the opposite: when you drive the car off the lot it finds its true value in the real marketplace. The $20,000 price tag was false: created by huge amounts of credit flooding the market. How does this happen? Fractional reserve banking (changing $1 of reserves into $10-40 worth of debt).
I suggest to the reader that things that are expensive (eg a college education) are that expensive precisely because of the credit available to buy them. If a bank comes to town with ten million dollars to loan out, things are going to go up in price.
I can go to Costco, open a line of credit and buy a bike for $200. Or I can buy a refurbished bike for $20 from the local bike repairman working out of his garage. Why the big difference? The $20 is the real value of a used bike. I theorize that the new bike would cost about $50 in the world of no banks.
This is what interests me about the Healthcare thing: the Feds want everyone to have healthcare insurance. You wouldn't need insurance if the prices were reasonable (only for catastrophic stuff). No one talks about increasing SUPPLY to make costs go down. Why is that? We can't train more doctors? Medicine can't be produced more efficiently?
Case in point: when I returned from South America I had a really bad ingrown toenail. The mega-hospital wanted $1200 (no doubt thinking to milk a sweet insurance policy), the local doctor wanted to take $80 x-rays first (all of this out of pocket), and finally we found a local podiatrist (Korean war surgeon) working out of a modest office (catering to the elderly) who did it on the spot, out-patient for $35 paid in cash. To me, that sums up the healthcare issue.
Back to the loans. I have no issue with the loaning of money, only the system which produces the loans. And I could still be wrong on that one. I am trying to get in touch with an expert in the area.
----------------------------------------------
Shawn,
.
Thank you for the thoughtful reply to my ramblings... I wasn't using the word paranoia in its precise dictionary definition but rather the its meaning in popular culture, which is better defined as over-anxious. I certainly wouldn't call putting your house in financial order as paranoid, thinking that the government is just a step away from taking your property though... Inflation is a red herring right now, look at commodity prices, across the board they're all down from last year... We don't have to worry about inflation for awhile yet. Deflation is a greater worry right now and one that can do a lot more damage. If inflation becomes a worry you'll see FED interest rates go up in order to take money out of circulation... Furthermore as Banks pay off their TARP loans (it's already started) that money won't be going back into circulation, but will instead go back to where it came from (nowhere, which is where the value for every currency comes from today.)
.
I'm by no means an expert either, and am doing as much reading as possible. Sadly, economics isn't as clear-cut as some of its proponents would like it to be, it is not a science, all the various theories (Austrian, Keynesian, etc., etc.) all have their strengths and weaknesses. Which is why most national economies are a mix.
.
When you talk about banking "products" what do you mean? Are you talking checking and savings accounts? Loans? CDs? Or are you talking about the more exotic offerings like derivatives, CDS, and the like? Banks serve a necessary function which is why they continue to exist and evolved out of the needs of mercantile Europe. Like anything though the system can be abuse, which is why banking regulations exist. Over the last 20 years those regulations have been dismantled or ignored allowing for blossoming profits and abuse and our current situation. You mentioned having your foot bit off before, and I'm wondering what happened? What do you mean when you say you don't want to trade your life essence for glass beads?
.
I wholehearedly agree with you that you cannot makes deals with Reality or find shortcuts around it, I don't believe though that economics or politics are "natural laws" or a facet of reality... They're artificial constructs shaped by history and the and needs/desires of a culture. The best maps and guides for these sort of things is educating yourself on how these systems work, in real life, not models and how they are used/abused by people. Then get involved and make sure your own voice is heard.
.
As always it's been a pleasure,
JH
.
Shawn's Response: Life Essense for glass beads means using my time to earn money to pay back principal and interest on money which never existed. Fractional reserve banking. That's my beef.
Now, I have no problem with a company like Paypal. That is more like a service, and I like that. I'm not saying banks don't have a role. With Paypal, I pay a percentage for the convenience and safety of using their service. I like it. I agree to it. I could be rid of them by simply taking only cash, MO or checks.
---------------------------------------
Hi again Shawn,
I had some criticisms of your recent blog post. They are intended to be in the spirit of friendly debate, so I hope you take them that way. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, your work, and your good cheer with everyone.
However, as all of the great philosophers throughout history have understood, there is no right to life or liberty without property. In fact, property is part and parcel of life itself.
I think a great many philosophers of a leftist bent would argue that property allows a great amount of denial of liberty, that the labor that you are equating with life is devalued for those that work for pennies an hour. In fact, it seems like quite an overstatement to say that all great philosophers thought that. One great philosopher said, "Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me." Although perhaps he did not assume a right to life or liberty.
If you are going to mark the Declaration of Independence as a keystone of American principle, how can you ignore equality, as in "all men are created equal," when you pare the document down to its most basic themes? And if you include equality, is the right to property compatible with equality? I think that the founding fathers had a lot of wonderful ideas, but I have a hard time seeing their vision of the country as either perfect or one that shouldn't change with time.
If a shoemaker were able to make shoes for the rest of eternity, then certainly there would not be a bare foot on the face of the earth. If the land developer were immortal, we would all live in a mansion.
I know your example is a hypothetical, but I don't really see it. If there were an endless supply of mansions, I imagine that the mansion maker would keep many for himself and maybe trade or sell the excess. Even if he lived forever and could make infinite mansions, I don't know why he would just give them away. Very few people will be satisfied with what they need. To me that greed is a bigger problem than are taxes, but I don't see a simple remedy for it.
Why did the founders not provide for the right to health care? Why did they not establish Medicare or Medicaid? Given a whole system of government whose purpose was to secure individual rights, why was this right so glaringly overlooked?
They also didn't mention a right to a basic education, and yet not only am I happy that I received one personally, I am also greatly pleased that I live in a community of people that also have some education. Improving my community improves my life. The logic of healthcare might not be exactly the same, but my point is that I believe that we can do a lot more together than secure individual rights. We can take of each other. We can help each other. We can create a community that is better for us all.
Government can only be organized to fulfill one of two purposes: to protect your property or to take it from you - for whatever purpose government or its constituents deem fit. There is no third choice. To organize society around competing groups stealing from one another is to create a society whose citizens exist in a perpetual state of war with one another -- for the use of force to obtain another's property without his consent is the definition of the state of war.
This gets to my main qualm with libertarianism--that the world is one of every man for himself. I don't think you need to be Christian to understand the idea, but the Bible certainly does address the issue in some famous passages.
Matthew 7:12
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.
Luke 6:31
Do to others as you would have them do to you.
If I am sick, I hope that people will take care of me and not think me a burden. If I am sick, I hope that people will look to help me rather than avoid helping me (as is the basic business of health insurance in the US without government regulation). In following the do unto others principle, I should want to take care of others who are sick. I want to be part of a society that embraces that idea. I have no medical training, but my tax dollars could pay someone who does.
I think people are at their best when they are working together and cooperating. A ten person group can get a lot more done than ten individuals. In a country of 300,000,000 people, we have an amazing opportunity to work together on the scale of millions. However, that opportunity is also a problem, because getting millions of people to work together is a logistical nightmare. I think that government can play a role of facilitating that large scale cooperation (it can also fail at that, but I don't think that is a reason to get rid of it).
Regards,
Michael
Shawn's Comments: People are indeed best when they are working together and cooperating. It's a matter of doing that voluntarily or involuntarily. Taxation is done under threat. Charity is done by free will. Of course, if you let a man have his free will he might blow his charity money on beer.
The "government must intervene or people won't do the right thing" argument is a potent one.
An interesting spin on your thoughts is States Rights. I think that the United States was never meant to be "one size fits all". I'd absolutely love to see a highly socialized state vs. a highly libertarian one. I'd love to be able to pick where to live. Once the Federal Government makes a law, there is no escape (other than to go into exile). Everyone must live it. I don't like that.
On the other hand, if the Federal Government doesn't create uniform programs/laws, there's a loss of efficiency and some grand projects would never happen. It's a toughie.
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 10:20 AM 0 comments

I found this on http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/ Thanks to reader AZ!
There are growing signs -- from a black swan in savings/debt reduction to massive debt loads to quarterly trillion dollar losses in personal wealth to stagnant/falling consumer purchases to persistently low consumer confidence -- that the parasite ridden American "consumer" is finally dead. If this is true, the economic model of the latter half of the last Century is likely dead too, and that will mean wrenching change. It's my belief that the dominant solution is to prepare for a local future to ride out this storm. Here are some of my random (more random than I would like) thoughts on what you should do to prepare:
.
Ruthlessly reduce debt. Nothing on credit. Pay off every loan. Strategically walk away from underwater assets (like homes that are worth less than the mortgage). This will allow you to stay one step ahead of the death throes of the old economy.
.
Turn your hollow home into a productive asset. Most homes are devoid of any productive capacity. Adding energy, food, etc production to them turns them into real, productive assets. Get your assets out of financial derivatives (stocks, bonds, etc.) as fast as you can and put them into productive assets (not commodities) you can touch.
.
Make everything you can yourself. Grow your own food. Produce your own energy. Make/repair your own clothes. Turn costs into savings. Reskill to do this. The new "fashionable trend" isn't what you can buy, it's what you can make. Anyone that buys "designer or branded" anything is a fool.
.
Work online. Convert your skills into something that can be sold electronically (most of my complex work is done this way). Develop the skills necessary to work as part of a virtual team. Telecommute whenever possible (and push to do this, even if it means less money), reduce the number of cars/dress clothes/etc you own in synch with this conversion (and move to a less expensive locale when possible!). Always have two jobs going at the same time.
.
Build a local business. Own assets that produce and sell that production locally. Even if it is small, it will help down the line via contact networks/experience (a new spin on modern "networking"). Develop the niche skills that sell locally. Group/tribe up when possible to tackle larger opportunities.
.
Barter. Cashless trades. Convert what you have to what you need. Skill set bartering is amazingly effective. Become part of a local barter network (the backchannel).
.
Bring your family home. Grow your home to accommodate more people. Bring back parents and grown kids (with their families). This will allow you to pool incomes and radically reduce workload/costs. It's also beneficial for security. NOTE: I've found that consideration/compromise is the best way to handle an expansive family home environment.
.
Suggestions welcome!!
.
This change doesn't require cute and crunchy notions about "lifestyle" environmentalism. It's all about mitigation of stresses in the short to medium term as living conditions deteriorate, while at the same time preparing to ride the resilient community wave to rapid and sustained long term success/wealth
Shawn's Comments
My wife and I are doing most of these things. We started a garden. We are networking locally to try and pull our existence in closer to ourselves. Tamara has a suprisingly useful ability: she can change basic ingredients into really, really good food. She's got a gift. We have found a lot of local food providers and get our stuff directly from them.
It's funny because I started as a close cut, conformist, conservative who's first political book was Rush Limbaugh's "I Told You So". Now I've got a Ron Paul sign up in my yard six months after the election (I plan on changing the 2008 to 2012).
The vein of these posts is not meant to be a form of running around and flailing my arms, but rather to calmly respond to what I see as a monstrous situation. Like most people I am prone to tune it out and just get about my business. However, I have decided to do both: to be as aware as I can, and educate myself, but also to quietly apply my personal influence/energy in a way that will most benefit myself, family and fellowman.
To whit: the banking system is a cancer on our society. Solution: find a different way to live. I'm not freaking out. Inasmuch as I am free to do so, I will withdraw from their company and find a different way to live. What is the opposite of banking (ie take out more than you put in)? Is it charity (put in more than you take out)? Or is it something else? The Lord is a Lord of Abundance, the Lord of Creation.
Here is another really interesting article:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200905/imf-advice
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 8:36 PM 0 comments
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 8:22 PM 0 comments
If an Axer casts his Rush animus on a model (charge SPD + 5") and then Epic Doomshaper casts Mayhem (charge, slam or trample SPD +5"), does that give a charge range of SPD +10".
This is coming up in my game of Hordes today. If you can cite a source, that would be helpful.
bluetablepainting@gmail.com
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 11:14 AM 0 comments
I've started up on Twitter again.
https://twitter.com/bluetable
Posted by Blue Table Painting at 9:16 AM 0 comments